p. 297−305
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 307−319
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 321−340
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 341−354
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 355−366
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 378−367
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 379−391
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 393−404
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 405−417
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 419−430
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 431−438
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
C> O. Finally, three protection zone was considered including I for areas with high vulnerability, II for areas with medium vulnerability, and III for areas with low and very low vulnerability that was presented in the form of a protective map.]]>
p. 439−455
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 457−471
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 473−484
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 489−504
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 505−515
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 518−528
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 529−536
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 537−550
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2
p. 551−561
2423-7795
Vol.71/No.2