Meisam Samadi; Abdolreza Bahremand; Ali Salajegheh; Majid Ownegh; Mohsen Hoseializade; Abolhasan Fathabadi
Abstract
In order to develop management plans for water and soil conservation, it is necessary to determine the sources of sediment production in watersheds. During the past three decades fingerprinting technique has been used extensively in determining the contribution of different sources of sediment. In this ...
Read More
In order to develop management plans for water and soil conservation, it is necessary to determine the sources of sediment production in watersheds. During the past three decades fingerprinting technique has been used extensively in determining the contribution of different sources of sediment. In this study, was carried out sediments fingerprinting and determine the contribution of each source to sediment production of the Toulbane watershed in Golestan province. To this end, 44 source samples were collected from forest, pasture, agriculture and bank erosion. Also 8 sediment samples were collected using Philips time-integrated sediment sampler. Afterward, the concentration of 34 geochemical properties was examined in the laboratory using the ICP device. Next, the optimal composite tracers were determined to discriminate sediment sources by using statistical tests including mass conservation test and Kruskal-Wallis. The contribution of different sources to sediment production was determined using the multivariate mixing model. Finally, the uncertainty in the case of a low number of data, was examined using the Monte Carlo method. As a result, after statistical tests, 12 tracers were selected as the optimal composite fingerprints. The bank erosion was main source to sediment production with 52.18% and the forest had the lowest contribution to sediment production with 4.39%. The contribution of agriculture and pasture was 33.23% and 10.21%, respectively. According to the uncertainty analysis, bank erosion is the most significant source to sediment production. Also, the high difference between the upper and the lower boundaries in different sources indicates high uncertainty.
Hamid Gholami; Mohammad Reza Mehrdadi; Mehdi Najafi; Mehdi Biniaz
Abstract
Quantifying source contribution of aeolian sediments is essential to prioritize sources and mitigate wind erosion. The objective of this research is quantifying uncertainty associated with results of sediment fingerprinting method using Monte-Carlo simulation technique in the Sirjan plain. Six sediment ...
Read More
Quantifying source contribution of aeolian sediments is essential to prioritize sources and mitigate wind erosion. The objective of this research is quantifying uncertainty associated with results of sediment fingerprinting method using Monte-Carlo simulation technique in the Sirjan plain. Six sediment samples were collected from the sand sheets and forty source samples consisting Qt (n=13); Qc (n=17); Qsg (n=5); and Dc (n=5) were collected from geological spatial sources in the surrounding area. Concentration of eight geochemical elements were measured in both sample group. A two-stage statistical method including Kruskal Wallis H test and a stepwise discriminant function analysis applied for discriminating of aeolian sediment sources. Based on two-stage statistical method, four geochemical properties consisting Fe, K, Mg and Cu were selected as optimum fingerprints. The Qc and Dc were recognized as dominant sources for aeolian sediments in the study area and also, full uncertainty or full range (0-100%) calculated for some source contributions. Therefore, management activities for mitigation of wind erosion should establish at the Qc and Dc source regions. This technique has great potential for quantifying source contribution of aeolian sediments at other area with active wind erosion.
