Hannaneh Sadat Sadat Mousavi; Afshin Danehkar; Ali Jahani; Vahid Etemad; Farnoush Attar Sahragard
Abstract
Different forms of land use development and human activities in protected areas are considered to be the main drivers of change, which have many effects on habitats, habitats, diversity and richness of species. The purpose of this research is to model the effect of human activities on the diversity of ...
Read More
Different forms of land use development and human activities in protected areas are considered to be the main drivers of change, which have many effects on habitats, habitats, diversity and richness of species. The purpose of this research is to model the effect of human activities on the diversity of vegetation using the artificial neural network method and determine the impact of ecological and human variables on them. This research was done in the Central Alborz protected area under the management of Alborz Province. To achieve the mentioned purpose, firstly, 101 plots and 101 soil samples were collected and, soil and vegetation analysis were performed on the samples. Finally, using the multilayer perceptron neural network method and using 18 input variables including physical and chemical variables of the soil, physiographic variables, and human factors variables , the effect of human activities on the diversity of vegetation in the study area modeled. According to the results, the vegetation diversity model with the structure of 1-5-18 according to the highest value of the coefficients of determination in the three categories of training, validation, and test data is equal to 0.82. 0.81 and 0.68 show the best structure optimization performance, distance from roads, electrical conductivity, and percentage of organic matter in the soil show the greatest effect on the diversity of vegetation in the study area. The model presented in this research is used as a decision support system in evaluating the effects of human activities on the diversity of vegetation in protected areas and provides the possibility of predicting the extent of these effects on the diversity of vegetation in these areas.
Kh. Osati; A. Salajegheh; S. Arekhi
Abstract
Spatiality assessment of groundwater pollution is very important to determine water quality condition, pollution sources and management decisions. In this case, GIS and geostatistics methods can be useful tools. Spatiality of groundwater quality parameters, in relation with various land uses, can be ...
Read More
Spatiality assessment of groundwater pollution is very important to determine water quality condition, pollution sources and management decisions. In this case, GIS and geostatistics methods can be useful tools. Spatiality of groundwater quality parameters, in relation with various land uses, can be very extremely. Therefore water samples from 52 wells in the Kurdan area were analyzed in this study. The results show that nitrate concentrations are less than maximum acceptable concentration in drinking water (i.e. 50 mg/L as nitrate recommended by ISIRI and WHO guideline values) except to one sample (2 percent of samples) in the study area. Various geostatistics methods, e.g. IDW (power 1-4), ordinary Kriging and RBF (five Kernel functions) were compared after assessing the variograms and the spatiality of nitrate samples. Then the model parameters were calibrated and through the specific methods, predicted and standard errors maps were prepared. Errors criteria show that Kriging is the best fitting model in the study area. Finally, probability map of NO3 concentrations exceeding the threshold value of 50 mg/L, is generated using the Indictor Kriging method. Spatiality of NO3 show that Nitrate concentration is increased where the rock type is permeable, land use is agriculture and slope is enough low to infiltrate polluted water into the wells. This research also tries to describe how to assess the spatiality of groundwater parameters by GIS.