Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Tarbiat Modares University

2 Tarbiat Modares University

3 Islamic Azad University, Firoozabad Branch, Iran

4 Mazandaran, Research Center of Agricultural and Natural Resources

Abstract

Effect of salt stress on the stomata variations was studied in Hedysarumcoronarium L. and HedysarumcriniferumBoiss., using optical microscope. The experimental design was a two factorial (species treatments and salt concentrations including 0, 100, 200, 250 mMNaCl) which arranged in a completely randomized design with four replicates and 50 seeds per replicate. Seeds were grown in plastic pots with sterile sand. All pots were irrigated by distilled water until germination stage. Then the pots were irrigated uniformly every other day with modified Hoagland’s nutrient solution during 40 days and finally stomata traits were measured. The data was analyzed using SPSS software. The difference between the means was compared using Duncan test (P<0.05). Results showed that the lowest amount of the stomata length, stomata width and area of stomata were observed at 300 Mm salinity stress. Length and width of stomata were reduced by increasing salinity stress. The length stomata decreased 22.33 and 23.76 (μm) for H. coronarium and H. criniferum respectively, while width stomata decreased by 17.13 and 18.62 (μm) respectively. The area of stomata decreased 397.11 and 442.83 (μm²) for H. coronarium and H. criniferum respectively. Salinity stress had positive effect on stomata density (mm²). The highest density of stomata was found in H. criniferumin 250 and 300 mM salinity levels.

Keywords

[1] Ashraf, M., and Harris, P.J.C. (2004). Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in Plants, Plant Science, 166: 3–16.
[2] Chatrath, A., Mandal, PK. and Anuradha, M. (2000). Effect of secondary salinization on photosynthesis in fodder oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes, Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 184: 13-16.
[3] Dilcher, D.L. (1974). Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. Botanical Review, 40: 1-157.
[4] Ghahraman, A. (1984). Colored flora Iran. Papilionaceae, volume 26.
[5] Grant, B.W., and Vatnick, I. (2004). Environmental correlates of leaf stomata density. Teaching Issues and Experiments in Ecology. Vol. 1. Experiment 2 access online at http://tiee.ecoed.net/vol/v1/ experiments/stomata/stomata.html.
[6] Gutierrez-Mas, J.C. (1983). La Zulla La reina de las forrajeiras de secano, Agriculture, 11: 576–677.
[7] Haron, N.W. and Moore, D.M. (1996). The taxonomic significance of leaf micro morphology in the genus Eugenia L. (Myrtaceae), Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 120:265–277.
[8] Hebbara, M., Rajakumar, G.R., Ravishankar, G. and Raghavaiah, C.V. (2003). Effect of salinity stress on seed yield through physiological parameters. Helia, 26: 155-160.
[9] Heidari, S.A.H. (1994). Variation in the sensivity of hodulation and nitrogen fixation to nitrate in annual Medicago species. Ph.D. Thesis. Adelide University Australia, P. 179.
[10] Hetherington, A.M., and Woodward, I.F. (2003).The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change, Nature, 424: 901–908.
[11] Issolah, R., H. Benhizia, and N. Khalfallah, 2006. Karyotype variation within some natural populations of sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L., Fabaceae) in Algeria. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 53: 1653–1664.
[12] Iyengar, E.R.R., and Reddy, M.P. (1996). Photosynthesis in Highly Salt Tolerant Plants, Handbook of Photosynthesis. Marshal Dekar, Baten Rose, USA, p. 897-909.
[13] James, R.A., Caemmerer, S.V. Condon, A.G. Zwart, A.B. and Munns, R. (2008). Genetic variation in tolerance to the osmotic stress component of salinity stress in durum wheat, Functional Plant Biology, 35: 111–123.
[14] Kemp, P.R., and Cunningham, G.L. (1981). Temperature and salinity effects on leaf anatomy and photosynthesis of Distichlis spicata (L.) Greene, American Journal of Botany,68: 507–516.
[15] Kilic, S., Cavusoglu, K. and Kabar, K. (2007). Effects of 24-epibrassinolide on salinity stress induced inhibition of seed germination, seedling growth and leaf anatomy of barley. Suleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Arts and Science, 2: 41–52.
[16] Lake, J.A., Woodward, F.I. and Quick, W.P. (2002). Long-distance CO2 signalling in plants, Journal of Experimental Botany, 53: 183–193.
[17] Levitte, J. (1980). Responses of plants to environmental stress. Academic Press. New York, 8: 567-573.
[18] Maas, E.V., and Grattan, S.R. (1999). Crop yields as affected by salinity. In: Skaggs, R.W., van Schilfgaarde, J. (Eds), Agricultural Drainage. Agron. Monograph 38. ASA, CSSA, SSA, Madison, WI p. 55–108.
[19] Metcalfe, C. R., and Chalk, L. (1950). Anatomy of the dicotyledons, 2. vols. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
[20] Moore, G., Sanford, P. and Wiley, T. (2006). Perennial pastures for Western Australia, Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, Bulletin 4690, Perth.
[21] Munns, R. (2002). Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Journal of plant cell and environment, 25: 239-250.
[22] Munns, R. (2005). Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytologist, 167: 645– 663.
[23] Robinson, S.P., Downton, W.J.S. and Millhouse, J.A. (1983). Photosynthesis and ion content of leaves and isolated chloroplasts of salt-stressed spinach, Plant Physiology, 73: 238–242.
[24] Sai-Kachout, S., A. Ben-Mansoura, K. Jaffel, J.C. Leclerc, M.N. Rejeb, & Z. Ouerghi, 2009. The effect of salinity on the growth of the halophyte Atriplex hortensis (Chenopodiaceae). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 7: 319-332.
[25] Solmaz, I., Sari, N., Dasgan, Y., Aktas, H., Yetisir, H. and Unlu, H. (2011). The effect of salinity on stomata and leaf characteristics of dihaploid melon lines and their hybrids. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 9 (3 and 4):172-176.
[26] Talamucci, P. (1998). Il ruolo della Sulla nell’attuale contesto della foraggicoltura italiana. In: La Sulla: possibili ruoli nella foraggicoltura mediterranea. I Georgofili, Quaderni 1998-I, Firenze, p. 7–27.