Government policies and investments that have been made in the past few decades with the aim of sustaining rural settlements have not reached desirable results, but today, most villages have adapted and adapted to environmental crises such as water crisis, adaptability and less agitation. In this research, policy and government investments in arid areas have been investigated and by means of quantitative and quantitative analysis, the effect of the above measures on reducing the water crisis is explained. The research is a descriptive and inferential goal from a strategic point of view, from surveying strategy, from the point of view of the causal nature and from the point of view of the method of collecting field data and documentation. The statistical population is 4626 rural households. The sample size with the Cochran formula is 354 people. In data analysis, the structural equation modeling model with partial least squares method and Smart PLS2 software were used to examine the conceptual model. The internal structure of the questionnaire and the convergent validity were determined using the results of the verifiable factor analysis and the mean of variance explained by AVE. For this purpose, standardized load factors were calculated and the AVE index was calculated for all items and variables. The test of assumptions proves that limited government actions in the past 10 years have had no effect on the reduction of the water crisis in the research area and the process of instability of rural settlements has not stopped.