Investigating and analyzing the network of key organizational stakeholders in collaborative land use planning

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Malayer University, Malayer, and Faculty member of Khatam Al-Anbia University of Technology, Behbahan, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Reviving Arid & Mountainous Regions, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Environmental Assessment, Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran

Abstract

Sustainable land management requires the identification of key land use planning actors. Social network analysis is one of the best ways to identify important factors in Management change. In this study, to analyze the stakeholders related to participatory Management in the watershed of Anzali Wetland, the criteria and policy indicators at the level of the network of organizational stakeholders were done using the method of social network analysis . In this regard, 36 organizational stakeholders related to participatory land use management in Gilan province were studied and analyzed. In this research indices of density, size, Reciprocity, Transitivity, Centralization and Geodesic Distance in the network of relationships at the macro level and Core-peripheral index in the middle scale and centrality indicators at the micro (actors) scale of the network were examined. Based on the results ofmacro-level indicators, the density is moderate and according to the results of the Reciprocity and the moderate amount of Mutual relations among organizational stakeholders, the cohesion and organizational capital are also assessed as moderate. The resilience and balance of the information exchange network are also low due to the low transitivity index. The results of the core-periphery index analysis show a higher density of links and greater organizational cohesion among central organizations compared to the peripheral subgroup. Also, the amount of information exchange between central and peripheral subgroups was evaluated as moderate. Based on the results of centrality indices, the geometric position of each actor was determined according to the desired criteria in the network

Keywords


  • Andriamihaja, O. R., Metz, F., Zaehringer, J. G., Fischer, M., and Messerli, P. (2021). Identifying agents of change for sustainable land governance. Land Use Policy, 100, 104882.
  • Bodin, Ö, and Crona, B. I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global environmental change, 19(3), 366-374.‏
  • Bodin, Ö, Crona, B., and Ernstson, H. (2006). Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology and society, 11(2).‏
  • Bodin, Ö, and Prell, C. (2011). Social network analysis in natural resource governance: summary and outlook.‏
  • Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of mathematical sociology, 2(1), 113-120.‏
  • Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., and Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: analytic technologies, 6.‏
  • Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., and Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science323(5916), 892-895.‏
  • Brandes, U., and Erlebach, T. (2005). Fundamentals. In Network analysis (pp. 7-15): Springer.
  • Clarke, G. (2007). Agents of transformation? Donors, faith-based organisations and international development. Third World Quarterly28(1), 77-96.‏
  • Cohen, P. J., Evans, L. S., and Mills, M. (2012). Social networks supporting governance of coastal ecosystems in Solomon Islands. Conservation Letters, 5(5), 376-386.‏
  • Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Harvard university press.‏
  • Crona, B. and Bodin, Ö. (2006). What you know is who you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management. Ecology and society, 11(2).‏
  • Di Gregorio, M., Fatorelli, L., Paavola, J., Locatelli, B., Pramova, E., Nurrochmat, D. R. ... and Kusumadewi, S. D. (2019). Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks. Global Environmental Change, 54, 64-77.‏
  • Duygan, M., Stauffacher, M. and Meylan, G. (2019). A heuristic for conceptualizing and uncovering the determinants of agency in socio-technical transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 33, 13-29.‏
  • Ebrahimi, F., Ghorbani, M., Salajegheh, A. and Mohsenisaravi, M. (2015), Social Network Analysis, Social Power and the Key Stakeholders in Action Plan for Water Resources Co-Management, (Case study: Jajrood River in Latian watershed, Darbandsar Village), Iran-Watershed Management Science & Engineering, 9(28), 21-32.
  • Etikan, I., Alkassim, R., and Abubakar, S. (2016). Comparision of snowball sampling and sequential sampling technique. Biometrics and Biostatistics International Journal, 3(1), 55.‏
  • Fao, U. (1999). The future of our land: facing the challenges. Guidelines for sustainable management of land resources. Food & Agricultural Organization and United Nations Environment Program, Rome, Italy.‏
  • Frisch Aviram, N., Cohen, N. and Beeri, I. (2020). Wind (ow) of change: A systematic review of policy entrepreneurship characteristics and strategies. Policy Studies Journal, 48(3), 612-644.‏
  • Ghorbani, M., 2012. The role of social networks in the mechanisms of rangeland exploitation, PhD thesis, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, 439 p.
  • Ghorbani, M. (2015). Action plan for monitoring and evaluation of socio-political networks in empowering local communities and comprehensive land management. Research Institute for Local Community Empowerment and Participatory Natural Resources Management, University of Tehran.
  • Ghorbani, M., Jafarian, V., Yazdani, M., and Abdolshahnejad, M. (2016). Analysis of Policy Network and Organizational Cohesion of the Stakeholders of Natural Resources of Semnan Province, Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 69(1), 155-166.
  • Grimble, R., and Chan, M. K. (1995). Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries: some practical guidelines for making management more participatory and effective. In Natural resources forum, 19(2), 113-124, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.‏
  • Hanneman, R. A. (2001). Introduction to Social Network Methods, Department of Sociology, University of California, Riverside [EB/OL].‏
  • Hogan, B. (2008). Analyzing social networks. The Sage handbook of online research methods, 141-160.‏
  • Holling, C. S., and Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation biology, 10(2), 328-337.‏
  • Huisman, M., and Duijn, M. (2005). Software for social network analysis (chapter 13). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek.‏
  • Isaac, M. E. (2012). Agricultural information exchange and organizational ties: The effect of network topology on managing agrodiversity. Agricultural systems, 109, 9-15.‏
  • Isaac, M. E., Anglaaere, L. C., Akoto, D. S. and Dawoe, E. (2014). Migrant farmers as information brokers: agroecosystem management in the transition zone of Ghana. Ecology and Society, 19(2).‏
  • JICA in collaboration with the Environmental Protection Agency and the Ministry of Jihad Agriculture. (2004). Annual report on the environmental status of Anzali wetland and its watershed.
  • Khanifar, H. (2010), An Introduction to the Concept of Land Management and Its Applications in Iran, Land use planning, 2(2), 5-26.
  • Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., ... and George, P. (2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global environmental change, 11(4), 261-269.
  • Lampert, B. and Mohan, G. (2019). A Transformative Presence? Chinese Migrants as Agents of Change in Ghana and Nigeria. In Chinese and African Entrepreneurs (pp. 147-169).
  • Latifi, Gh. R. (2009). The History of Spatial Planning Evolution in Development Programs in Iran: Pre and Post Revolution of 1979. Social Development and Welfare Planning, 1 (1): 111-147.
  • Makhdoum, M. F. (2014), Fundamental of Land Use Planing, University of Tehran Press.
  • Marin, A., and Wellman, B. (2011). Social network analysis: An introduction. The SAGE handbook of social network analysis, 11.‏‏
  • Matous, P. (2015). Social networks and environmental management at multiple levels: soil conservation in Sumatra. Ecology and Society, 20(3).‏
  • Mbaru, E. K. and Barnes, M. L. (2017). Key players in conservation diffusion: using social network analysis to identify critical injection points. Biological Conservation, 210, 222-232.‏
  • Milhorance, C., Bursztyn, M. and Sabourin, E. (2020). From policy mix to policy networks: assessing climate and land use policy interactions in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1-16.
  • Mintrom, M. and Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649-667.‏‏
  • Morrison, T. H., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Lemos, M. C., Huitema, D., Phelps, J. ... and Quinn, T. (2019). The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance. Global Environmental Change, 57, 101934.‏
  • Munroe, D. K., Batistella, M., Friis, C., Gasparri, N. I., Lambin, E. F., Liu, J. ... and Nielsen, J. (2019). Governing flows in telecoupled land systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 38, 53-59.‏
  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2018). Water Governance in the Face of Global Change, Ghorbani, M. Univercity of Thehran Prss, Tehran.
  • Salehi, E., Sangachin, F. p. (2009). An Analysis of Challenges Facing Territorial Management In Iran, Rahbord, 18(52), 149-181.
  • Sharifzadegan, M. H and Razavi Dehkordi, S. A. (2010), Evaluation of National Strategic Spatial Planning Process in Iran with Recommendations for Improvement,Environmental Sciences. 7(4), 87-100.
  • Soltani, N. (2013). Evaluation Land Use Planning Projects Face Obstacles in Iran Integrate Approach. The Journal of Spatial Planning, 17 (3), 63-84.
  • Tayfuri, V., and Akbari, p. (2017). Survey of population and selective of population indicators of Guilan province in 1345-95: Management and Planning Organization of Guilan Province.
  • Turner, I. L., and Nielsen, P. (1997). Rapid water table fluctuations within the beach face: Implications for swash zone sediment mobility? Coastal Engineering, 32(1), 45-59.‏
  • Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge university press.‏
  • Wasserman, S., Faust, K., and Iacobucci, D. (1995). Social network analysis: Theory and methods. Cambridge University Press.
  • Wehrmann, B. (Ed.). (2012). Land use planning: concept, tools and applications. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ).‏
  • Weiss, K., Hamann, M., Kinney, M., and Marsh, H. (2012). Knowledge exchange and policy influence in a marine resource governance network. Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 178-188.‏
  • Westley, F. R., Tjornbo, O., Schultz, L., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Crona, B. and Bodin, Ö. (2013). A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(3).‏
Volume 74, Issue 3
December 2021
Pages 557-569
  • Receive Date: 13 October 2020
  • Revise Date: 28 November 2020
  • Accept Date: 29 November 2020
  • First Publish Date: 22 November 2021