Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant professor of Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Msc of Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant professor of Department of Rangeland, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This study Proceeded the Identity of the shackles of Participation pasture manageres about Performance Projects range- Management to Central Part kohkiloie Township. The purpose in this study was to Identity of the shackles of Participation pasture manageres about Performance Projects range- Management to Central Part kohkiloie Township. The present research is applied research by using descriptive and correlational methods and its instrument was questionnaire. The present statistical community consisted of 197 numbers of the pasture manageres which based on the ''Cochran'' formula, by using of Random Sampling, the number of 110 were selected as the statistical sample.Data was analyzed by using SPSS win software. Findings Through Spearman Rnank Correlation Coefficient, Pearson's Correlation Coefficient and Eta Correlation Coefficient has shown that based on the pasture manageres' views, the Personal Factors, the Social Factors, Economical Factors, Political Factors and Didactic Factors wouldeffect on the shackles of Participation pasture manageres about Performance Projects range- Management, while the variable of Age, Precedence, Size Land, Literacy and Sexuality don't effect on the shackles of Participation pasture manageres about Performance Projects range- Management. The result from stepwise regression analysis showed that, the Social Factors and Didactic Factors had positive effects on shackles of Participation pasture manageres about Performance Projects range- Management.
 

Keywords

ی‌‌شود سازمان جنگل‌ها و مرتع بذر لازم را در اختیار مرتع‌داران قرار دهد تا مرتع‌داران در بذرپاشی و بذرکاری مشارکت کنند؛
2. با توجه به تأثیر عوامل آموزشی، پیشنهاد می‌شود مروجان منابع طبیعی با مرتع‌داران ارتباط کافی داشته باشند، به نیازهای آموزشی دامداران توجه کنند، و دوره‌های آموزشی‌- ترویجی مناسب برای شرکت مرتع‌داران در طرح‌های مرتع‌داری برگزار کنند؛
 

 

[1] Aboueh, Kh. (2001). Investigation effective social factors on animal husbandary participation in rangeland projects of Lar, Quarterly of Forest and Rangeland, 53, 7.
[2] Arkhi, S. (2001). Investigation effective factors on lack of participation rangeland in range reformation and rehabitilization ranges, The proceeding of the second national seminar on rangeland in Iran, 16-18 Bahman 1380, Tehran university, 107p.
[3] FAO. (1989). Community foestry, participatory assessment, monitoring and evaluation, Rome. 3p.
[4] Finsrerbusch, K. and Wicklin, W.A. (1989). Beneficiery participation in development project, Economic development and cultural change, 37(3): 573-594.
[5] Hematzadeh, Y. and Khalighi, N. (2006). Investigation effective factors on lack of participation beneficiary of rangeland and watershed projects, Journal of agriculturl science and natural resources, 13(4) 9-10.
[6] Hosseinpour, A. (1993). Investigation participation necessity and need assessment villagers for protection of soil and watershed, Msc. Dissertation, Tarbiat Modares university. 107p.
[7] Hunstsinger, L. and Fortman, L.P. (1990). California privately owned oak woodsland: owner, use and management, Journal of range management, 43(2): 147-152.
[8] Jalali, M. and Karami, E. (2006). Determining effective factors on rangeland participation in rangeland cooperatives of Kurdestan province, Pajouhesh & Szandegi, 70, 11-12.
[9] Kazemi Roudi, M. (2005). Investigation impact of implementing of rangeland projects on income. Msc. Dissertation, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran, 103p.
[10] MirzaAli, A. (1998). Recognization and essesment of restrictive factors in progress of rangelands rehabitilization, Msc dissertation, Isfahan Industrial University, 43p.
[11] Oakley, P., marsden, D., and malla, Y.B. (1991). Projects with people: the practice of participation in rural development, International labor organization, Geneva, 77p.
[12] Okiira, P.E. (2000). Sustaining Participation: What are the challenges? PlA Notes, 39, IIED, Uk. 14-16.
[13] Parawansa, K.I. (2002). Women in Parliament, Stockholm: international IDEA, http://wwwIdea. Int. 41-52.
[14] Sabounchi, A. (2006). Effective factors on rural rangeland participation in range rehabitilization projects of Kermanshah township, Msc, Dissertation, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran, 54p.
[15] Sadi, M. (1998). Role of extension in rangeland projects and producing forage, Quarterly of Salehin Roosta, 159, 11.
[16] Shaeri, A.M. and Sadi, H. (2003). Practical guidelines of natural resources extension and participation, Tehran: Pouneh publication, 7p.
[17] ShahidZandi, K. (1997). Influencing factors on animal husbandary participation in range rehabitilization, Msc, dissertation, Tehran university, 11p.
[18] Shahidi, K. (2003). Study some effective factors on irrigation projects participation frow viewpoints of farmers of northwest Iran, Msc, Dissertation, Tehran university, 11-12.
[19] Tosi, M.A. (1993). Participation, Publication of education center of governmental management, 12p.