نشریه علمی - پژوهشی مرتع و آبخیزداری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد آبخیزداری، دانشکدة منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران

2 استادیار دانشکدة منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

در مدیریت منابع آب یکی از رویکردهای مهم‌ِ مشارکتی حکمرانی محلی آب است. به همین جهت پایش اجتماعی روابط ذی‌نفعان محلی برای برنامه‌ریزی و مدیریت منابع و دستیابی به حکمرانی خوب آب در سطح محلی الزامی است. بر این اساس، به تحلیل شبکة اجتماعی، به منزلة یک رویکرد، در تحلیل روابط ذی‌نفعان محلی به منظورِ مدیریت پایدار منابع آب توجه شده است. هدف از این پژوهش پایش اجتماعی شبکة ذی‌نفعان محلی با استفاده از تحلیل شبکة اجتماعی در سامان عرفی رزین در شهرستان کرمانشاه است. این کار بر اساس پیوند‌های اعتماد و مشارکت و با استفاده از شاخص‌های کمّی و ریاضی سطح کلان شبکه (تراکم، تمرکز، دوسویگی پیوندها، و فاصلة ژئودزیک) صورت گرفته است. نتایج نشان داد میزان سرمایة اجتماعی بر اساس پیوندهای اعتماد و مشارکت ضعیف است و پایداری و تعادل شبکه نیز در حد ضعیف ارزیابی می‌شود که نشان‌دهندة پایین‌بودن میزان اعتماد و مشارکت متقابل در میان ذی‌نفعان محلی است. همچنین، میزان همبستگی بین دو پیوند اعتماد و مشارکت در میان بهره‌برداران آب، بر اساس شاخص QAP، 37 درصد و در حد ضعیف است. نتایج شاخص میانگین فاصلة ژئودزیک بر اساس پیوند اعتماد و مشارکت نشان می‌دهد سرعت گردش اعتماد و مشارکت در میان افراد در حد متوسط تا پایین است. بر اساس نتایج، می‌توان استدلال کرد ضعیف‌بودن سرمایة اجتماعی و عدم اتحاد و یگانگی در میان افراد به کاهش سرعت گردش اعتماد و مشارکت منجر شده و در نتیجه حکمرانی خوب منابع آب را با چالش مواجه کرده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Social Monitoring in Local Stakeholders Network to Water Resources Local Governance (Case Study: Razin Watershed, Kermanshah City)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Salari 1
  • Mehdi Ghorbani 2
  • Arash Malekian 2

1 MSc Student of Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Prof., Faculty of Natural resources, University of Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Water resources local governance can is one of the most influential collaborative approach in the water resources management. Social monitoring of local stakeholders plays an important role in planning, resources management and water efficient governance. Therefore to achieve this goal, social network analysis has been considered as an approach of analysis of the relationship among local stakeholders, in order to sustainable management of water resources. This study aims to social monitoring in local stakeholders network using social network analysis in Razin watershed located in Kermanshah province. This work based on social network analysis approach as method with emphasis on trust and collaboration ties and quantitative and mathematical indicators on the macro-level of local stakeholders network (Density, Centralization, Reciprocity and Geodesic Distances). The results showed that the level of social capital in the village has been measured weak. The degree of reciprocity indicator for trust and collaboration ties and the stability of network is weak. Also the level of correlation between trust and collaboration is 37 percent. The results of the mean geodesic distance on the basis of trust and collaboration ties showed that circulation velocity of trust and collaboration is moderate to low. Can be concluded on the basis of the results, weak social capital and low union between stakeholders, makes reduce circulation of trust and collaboration and therefore local governance of water resources in the region is challenged

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social monitoring
  • Water Local Governance
  • Social capital
  • Local Stakeholders Network
  • Razin Village

 

[1] Alibabaei, E., Ghorbani, M., Marvi Modjer, M.R. and Avatefi Hemmat, M. (2015). Social Monitoring: Analysis and Social capital in Sustainable Forest Resources Management (Case Study: Kodir village, Kojur district, Mazandaran province), Journal of Forest and Wood Product (Acsepted In Persian).
[2] Alipoor, P., Zahedi, M.J. and Shiani, M. (2009). Trust and Collaboration (Analysis of The Relationship Between Trust and Social Collaboration in Tehran City, Iranian Sociology, 10(2), 109-135.
[3] Barnes-Mauthe, M., Allen, S.D., Gray, S.A. and Leung, P.S. (2013). The influence of ethnic diversity on social network structure in a common-pool resource system: implications for collaborative management, Ecology andSociety, 18(1), 23.
[4] Bastani, S. and Raeisi, M. (2012). Social Network Analysis as a Method: Using Whole Network Approach for Studying FOSS Communities, Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 14(2).
[5] Berkes, F. (2010). Devolution of environment and resources governance: trends and future, Environ. Conserv, 37, 489e500.
[6] Bindra, S.P., Hamid, A., Salem, H., Hamuda, Kh. and Abulifa, S. (2014). Sustainable integrated water resources management for energy production and food security in Libya, Procedia Technology, 12, 747-752.
[7] Bisung, E. and Elliott, S. (2014). Toward a social capital based framework for understanding the water-health nexus, Journal of Social Science & Medicine, 108, 194-200.
[8] Bodin, Ö. and Crona, B.I. (2008). Management of Natural Resources at the Community Level: Exploring the Role of Social Capital and Leadership in a Rural Fishing Community, World development, 36(12), 2763-2779.
[9] Bodin, Ö. and Norberg, J. (2005). Information network topologies for enhanced local adaptive management, Environmental Management, 35(2), 175-193.
[10] Bodin, O. and Prell, C. (2011). Social network in natural resources management, Cambridge University Press.
[11 Bordons, M., Aparicio, J., González-Albo, B. and Díaz-Faes, A.A. (2015). The relationship between the research performance of scientists and their position in co-authorship networks in three fields, Journal of Informetrics, 9, 135-144.
[12] Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. and Freeman, L.C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis, Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
[13] Braga, B., Chartres, C., Cosgrove, W.J. da Cunha, L.V., Gleick, P.H., Kabat, P., Ait Kadi, M., Loucks, D.P., Lundqvist, J., Narain, S. and Xia, J. (2014). Water and the Future of Humanity, Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation Avenida de Berna 45A. 1067-001 Lisbon , Portugal.
[14] Burt, R. (2003). The social capital of structural holes. Pages 148-189 in M.F. Guillen, R. Collins, P. England, and M. Meyer, editors, The new economic sociology: developments in an emerging field, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, New York, USA.
[15] Cohen, M.D., Riolo, R.L. and Axelrod, R. (2001(. The role of social structure in the maintenance of cooperative regimes, Rationality and Society, 13(1), 5-32.
[16] Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
[17] Ebrahimi Azarkharan, F., Ghorbani, M., Salajegheh, A. and Mohseni Saravi, M. (2014). Social Network Analysis of Local Stakeholders in Action Plan for Water Resources Co-Management (Case study: Jajrood River in Latian watershed, Darbandsar village), Iran- Watershed management science Engineering, 8(25), 47-56.
[18] Ghorbani, M. (2012). The role of social networks in operation mechanisms of Rangeland (Case Study: Taleghan area), Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Natural Resources, Tehran University, 430 P.
[19] Ghorbani, M. (2014). Network analysis; modeling, policy-making and planning of natural resources co-management, University of Tehran and the Department of Forest, Rangeland and Watershed Management.
[20] Ghorbani, M., Azarnivand, H. Mehrabi, A.A., Bastani, S., Jafari, M. and Nayebi, H. (2013). Social network analysis: A new approach in policy-making and planning of natural resources co-management, Journal of Natural Environment, Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, 65(4), 553-568.
[21] Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
[22] Green, O.O., Garmestani, A.S., Van Rijswick, H.F.M.W. and Keessen, A.M. (2013). EU water governance: striking the right balance between regulatory flexibility and enforcement?, Ecology and Society, 18(2), 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05357-180210.
[23] Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Folke, C. and Johnsson, K. (2006). Trust–building, Knowledge Generation and Organization Innovations: The Role of a Bridging Organization for Adaptive Co-Management of a Wetland Landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden, Human Ecology, 34(4), 573-592.
[24] Hanneman, R.A. and Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods, University of California Riverside, California.
[25] Hirschi, C. (2010). Strengthening Regional Cohesion: Collaborative Networks and Sustainable Development in Swiss Rural Areas, Journal of Ecology and Society, 15(4), 16. http://www.tebyan-zn.ir/economy.html
[26] Jatel, N. (2013). Using social network analysis to make invisible human actor water governance networks visible–the case of the Okanagan vallay. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of arts in the college of graduate studies (Interdisciplinary Studies) the University of British Columbia.
[27] Koutsou, S., Partalidou, M. and Ragkos, A. (2014). Young farmers' social capital in Greece: Trust levels and collective actions, Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 204-211.
[28] Lale, U. and Klusia, M. (2013). Good Governance for food, water and energy security, Aquatic Procedia, 1, 44-63.
[29] Lienert, J., Schnetzer, F. and Ingold, K. (2013). Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes, Journal of Environmental Management, 125, 134-148.
[30] Lubell, M., Robins, G. and. Wang, P (2014). Network structure and institutional complexity in an ecology of water management games,Ecology and Society, 19(4), 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06880-190423.
[31] Mariola, J. (2012). Farmers, trust, and the market solution to water pollution: The role of social embeddedness in water quality trading, Journal of Rural Studies, 28, 577-589.
[32] Mobasheri, M. (2008). What is Social Capital? Hamshahri Nwespaper, 4779.
[33] Mohammad Vali Samani, Jamal (2005). Report Title: Water Resources Management and Sustainable Development, Office Infrastructure Studies.
[34] Motevaseli, M. and Zobeyri, H. (2013). Social Cohesion; Origins of Economic Development, Journal of Rural Development, 5(2), 74-79.
[35] Nath, T.k., Inoue, M. and Pretty, J. (2010). Formation and Function of Social Capital for Forest Resource Management and the Improved Livelihoods of Indigenous People in Bangladesh, Journal of Rural and Community Development, 5(3), 104-122.
[36] Newig, J., Günther, D. and Pahl-Wostl, C. (2010). Synapses in the network: learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management, Ecology and Society, 15(4), 24.
[37] OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2011). Water governance in OECD countries, A multi-level approach, OECD Studies on water. Paris, France: OECD.
[38] Ostrom, E. )1990(. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[39] Oxoby (2009). Understanding Social Inclusion, Social Cohesion and Social Capital, University of Calgary Economic Research Paper, 09.
[40] Plickert, G., Cˆot´e, R.R. and Wellman, B. (2007). It’s not who you know, it’s how you know them: Who exchanges what with whom?, Social Networks, 29, 405-429.
[41] Pretty, J. and Ward, H. (2001). Social Capital and the Environment, Journal of World Development, 29(2), 209-227.
[42] Rijke, J., Brown, R., Zevenbergen, Ch., Ashley, R., Farrelly, M., Morison, P. and van Herk, S. (2012). Fit-for-purpose governance: A framework to make adaptive governance operational, Environmental Science & Policy, 22, 73-84.
[43] Rogers, P. and Hall, A.W. (2003). Effective water governance, Stockholm, Sweden: Global Water Partnership (Technical Advisory Committee Background Papers, No. 7).
[44] Saimy, I.S. and Yusof, N.A.M. (2013). The Need for Better Water Policy and Governance in Malaysia, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 371-375.
[45] Samimi, A. (2007). Social Capital and Development, Proceedings of the Conference on Social Capital and Development in Iran, Tehran, Higher Education and Research Institute of Planning and Management, 167-168.
[46] Shafiaa, S. (2009). Relation to social inclusion and sustainable development of the local residents of informal settlements. MSc. Dissertation, Department of Urban Management, Allameh Tabataba'i University.
[47] Shah, T., Burke, J. and Villholth, K. (2009). Groundwater: A Water Assessment of Scale and Significance, Proceedings of the Groundwater Management in Malaysia Status and Challenges held on 25-26 March at Putrajaya (pp. 15-47), Akademi Sains Malaysia.
[48] Stein, C., Ernstson, H. and Barron, J. (2011). A social network approach to analyzing water governance: The case of the Mkindo catchment, Tanzania, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 36, 1085-1092.
[49] Turrini, A., Cristofoli, D., Frosini, F. and Nasi, G. (2010). Networking literature about determinants of network effectiveness, Public Administration, 88, 528-550.
[50] UNDP (2007). Water Governance Facility. http://www.watergovernance.org/
[51] Vignola, R., McDaniels, T.L. and Scholz, R.W. (2013). Governance structures for ecosystem-based adaptation: Using policy network analysis to identify key organizations for bridging information across scales and policy areas, Enviromental sciens & policy, 31, 71-84.
[52] Wasserman, S. and Faust, F. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and applications, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 358 p.
[53] William, A. and Vaux, Jr. (2014). The Emerging Global Water Crisis: Managing Scarcity and Conflict Between Water Users, Journal of Advances in AgronomyVolume, 95, 1-76.
[54] Woolcock, M. (2011). What Distinctive Contribution Can Social Cohesion Make to Development Theory, Research and Policy?, World Bank, OECD Conference, Paris.
[55] Zanini, M.T.F. and Migueles, C.P. (2013). Trust as an element of informal coordination and its relationshipwith organizational performance, Economia, 14, 77-87.